From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 11, 1969


Order entered May 20, 1969, denying defendant's motion for a protective order, unanimously modified on the facts and the law, without costs or disbursements, to provide that the examination of defendant's employees shall be in Jacksonville, Florida, and, at the election of plaintiffs, shall be by written interrogatories or open commission. If plaintiffs elect to examine by open commission, the parties shall pay their respective expenses, which shall be taxed as costs by the prevailing party. Otherwise the order is affirmed. The requirement that witnesses travel a thousand miles is onerous and likely unnecessary. If the witnesses should come to New York for the trial or for any reason prior thereto, plaintiffs shall be advised beforehand and accorded the opportunity of conducting the examination directed. (See Pakter v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Piel v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Winds v. Hydropress, 279 App. Div. 1005.) Defendant's brief offers to submit the witnesses for examination in New York City about one week before trial.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 1969
33 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN BOTTALICO et al., Respondents, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 756 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Wiseman v. Am. Motors Sales Corp.

Furthermore, the record is devoid of any proof that plaintiff would not have an equal opportunity to examine…

Matter of Ratner v. Ratner

) See CPLR 3108; Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 33 A.D.2d 756 (1st Dept.); Osborne v. Miller, 30…