Bothe v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Full title: Marcia Bothe Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court: United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

No. 9981-20 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

9981-20

03-07-2022

Marcia Bothe Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

James S. Halpern Judge

ORDER

James S. Halpern Judge

On February 28, 2022, respondent filed the following documents:

(1) At docket entry 18, Motion for Order To Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f);

(2) At docket entry 19, Motion for Leave To File Out of Time Motion for Order To Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f); and

(3) At docket entry 20, a lodged Motion for Order To Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f).

The Court will strike from the record docket entry 18, as it appears to be a duplicate of docket entry 20. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced docket entry 18 filed on February 28, 2022, is hereby deemed stricken from the record and shall not be viewable as part of this case. It is further

ORDERED that respondent's Motion for Leave To File Out of Time Motion for Order To Show Cause Why Proposed Facts and Evidence Should Not be Accepted as Established Pursuant to Rule 91(f) (docket entry 19), is granted.