Boston v. Garcia

Full title: ANDRE' BOSTON, Plaintiff, V. GARCIA et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

CIV S-10-1782-KJM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

ANDRE' BOSTON, Plaintiff, v. V. GARCIA et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-10-1782-KJM DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. August 9, 2012

          ORDER

          KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, Judge.

         On June 20, 2012, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's order filed June 6, 2012, denying his motion for appointment of counsel. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 6, 2012, is affirmed.