From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

U.S.
Oct 26, 1885
115 U.S. 221 (1885)

Opinion

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Submitted October 22, 1885. Decided October 26, 1885.

There being no assignment of error or appearance for plaintiff in error, judgment below is affirmed on motion of defendant in error, without examining the record.

No appearance for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George A. Nourse for defendant in error.


The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court.


When this cause was reached on the call of the docket it was submitted by the defendant in error on a printed brief. An assignment of errors was not annexed to or returned with the writ of error, as required by § 997 Rev. Stat. At the last term the counsel for the plaintiff in error was permitted to withdraw his appearance, and no one has taken his place. No argument has been submitted in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no errors have been assigned in any form. We, therefore, affirm the judgment without opening the record.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

U.S.
Oct 26, 1885
115 U.S. 221 (1885)
Case details for

Boston Mining Co. v. Eagle Mining Co.

Case Details

Full title:BOSTON MINING COMPANY v . EAGLE MINING COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 26, 1885

Citations

115 U.S. 221 (1885)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Block

Since the case was disposed of upon demurrer to the declaration, there is no bill of exceptions or statement…