From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boston Market Equip. Co. v. Chin

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 16, 1987
520 A.2d 232 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)

Opinion

(4997)

Submitted on briefs January 9, 1987

Decision released January 16, 1987

Action to recover amounts allegedly due for goods sold and delivered to the defendant on account, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven and referred to Steven R. Rolnick, attorney factfinder, who filed a report finding the facts in favor of the plaintiff; thereafter, the court, Fracosse, J., rendered judgment in accordance with the findings of fact, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

F. Woodward Lewis, Jr., filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).

Amy J. Horowitz filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).


In this suit for payment of goods sold and delivered, the defendant's first claim of error attacks the findings of the attorney referee that the plaintiff sold and delivered goods to the defendant individually, and that the defendant did not meet his burden of proving that he was acting for a corporation. The defendant failed, however, to supply this court with a transcript. We therefore have no basis on which to disturb these findings.

The defendant's second claim of error, namely, that the plaintiff did not consent to a hearing by an attorney referee, is disposed of by Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc., 199 Conn. 496, 516-17, 508 A.2d 415 (1986).


Summaries of

Boston Market Equip. Co. v. Chin

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jan 16, 1987
520 A.2d 232 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
Case details for

Boston Market Equip. Co. v. Chin

Case Details

Full title:BOSTON MARKET EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. WILLIAM CHIN

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jan 16, 1987

Citations

520 A.2d 232 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
520 A.2d 232

Citing Cases

Chomko v. Patmon

We are unable to resolve these opposing claims because the plaintiff has not supplied this court with a…