From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bossuk v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 28, 2022
21cv8273 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21cv8273 (DLC)

11-28-2022

RICHARD BOSSUK, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTA SPORTSWEAR, INC. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, District Judge

On November 22, 2022, the defendants moved for reconsideration of a November 8 Order terminating the defendants' November 4 motion to dismiss. Rule 12(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., states, "A motion asserting any of [the defenses listed in Rule 12(b)] must be made before pleading if a responsive pleading is allowed." Rule 12(b) motions to dismiss under those listed defenses that are filed after an answer are untimely. See, e.g., Lehrer v. J&M Monitoring, Inc., No. 20cv6956, 2022 WL 2392441, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. July 1, 2022) (collecting cases).

Therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendants'' November 22 motion for reconsideration is denied.


Summaries of

Bossuk v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 28, 2022
21cv8273 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Bossuk v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD BOSSUK, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTA SPORTSWEAR, INC. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

21cv8273 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 28, 2022)