From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boslowitz v. Goldin Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 9, 1925
124 Misc. 746 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)

Opinion

April 9, 1925.

Morse S. Hirsch, for the appellant.

Snitkin Goodman [ Abraham Goodman of counsel], for the respondent.


The trial justice, having heard and denied the defendant's motion to set aside the verdict in plaintiff's favor at the term at which the action was tried, and judgment having been entered, was without power to grant the defendant what was in effect a rehearing thereon after the expiration of the term at which the action was tried and upon such rehearing to grant the motion to set aside the verdict. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 549; Clancy v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co., 226 N.Y. 213; Ellis v. Hearn, 132 A.D. 207. )

Order of February 25, 1924, reversed, with costs, and judgment reinstated. Appeal from order of December 6, 1923, dismissed.

All concur; present, BIJUR, MITCHELL and PROSKAUER, JJ.


Summaries of

Boslowitz v. Goldin Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 9, 1925
124 Misc. 746 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
Case details for

Boslowitz v. Goldin Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL BOSLOWITZ, Appellant, v . S. GOLDIN CO., Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1925

Citations

124 Misc. 746 (N.Y. App. Term 1925)
209 N.Y.S. 308