From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bosley v. A. Mason Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

November, 1924.


Award reversed and matter remitted to the State Industrial Board, with costs against said Board to abide the event, on the ground that loss of a phalanx [phalange] and a half does not constitute the loss of a finger under the Workmen's Compensation Law, section 15, subdivision 3-n, and upon the authority of Baron v. National Metal S. S. Co. ( 182 App. Div. 284) Forbes v. Evening Mail (194 id. 563). All concur.

See Workmen's Compensation Law of 1922, § 15, subd. 3, ¶ n. — [REP.


Summaries of

Bosley v. A. Mason Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Bosley v. A. Mason Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. WILLIAM BOSLEY, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1924

Citations

211 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Citing Cases

Claim of Flagg v. GAF Corp.

The finding that a portion of the second phalange was amputated is supported by substantial evidence. The…