From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boskowitz v. Ulmann. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1907
121 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

November 15, 1907.

Charles L. Craig, for the appellant.

Harold Nathan [ John R. Dos Passos on brief], for respondent.

Present — PATTERSON, P.J., INGRAHAM, LAUGHLIN, CLARKE and HOUGHTON, JJ.


This is an appeal by the defendant Joseph H. Sulzbacher from an order denying his motion, separately made, to vacate an order for the examination of his codefendant Ulmann, to enable plaintiff to frame a complaint against both of them. The record is otherwise in all material respects the same as that presented on the appeal by the defendant Ulmann ( 121 App. Div. 887), argued and decided herewith, and upon the authority of the decision made on that appeal the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Boskowitz v. Ulmann. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 15, 1907
121 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Boskowitz v. Ulmann. No. 2

Case Details

Full title:JESSE L. BOSKOWITZ, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . ALBERT ULMANN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1907

Citations

121 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
106 N.Y.S. 871