From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bosco v. U-Haul of Flatbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 10, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the provision thereof which directed the defendant to pay a sanction in the sum of $2,500 to the attorneys for the plaintiffs Joseph Bosco and Debra Bosco is deleted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing in accordance herewith.

In imposing a sanction against the defendant, the court failed to set forth in a written decision the offending conduct, why the court found the conduct frivolous, and why the amount awarded was appropriate ( see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.2; Flaherty v Stavropoulos, 199 A.D.2d 301). Furthermore, the defendant's attorney was not afforded an opportunity to be heard on the matter of sanctions ( see, Breslaw v. Breslaw, 209 A.D.2d 662). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing and reconsideration of the issue of an appropriate sanction, if any.

We further note that should the Supreme Court decide to impose a sanction against the defendant, payment should be deposited with the clerk of the court for transmittal to the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance instead of the attorneys for the plaintiffs Bosco ( see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.3).

Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bosco v. U-Haul of Flatbush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1997
244 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Bosco v. U-Haul of Flatbush

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BOSCO et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U-HAUL OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 373 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
664 N.Y.S.2d 92

Citing Cases

Klein v. Seenauth

97 that defendants may examine the subject bicycle "at any time", and forestalled discovery by ignoring…

Italian Am. Civic Assn. of Mineola v. Cataldo

The alleged hearing irregularities cited by the defendant are not grounds for which relief from a judgment…