Opinion
24716-18
03-28-2022
Matthew Tamba Borward Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION
Mark V. Holmes, Judge.
We called the case remotely on March 21, 2022 during our trial calendar for St. Paul, Minnesota. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for respondent appeared and orally moved to dismiss for lack of prosecution, albeit with some concessions. After due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is
ORDERED that respondent's oral motion to dismiss is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is also
ORDERED and DECIDED that there are deficiencies in income tax due from petitioner for the 2015, 2016, and 2017 taxable years in the amounts of $625.00, $3,913.00, and $5,430.00, respectively. It is also
ORDERED AND DECIDED that there are no additions to tax due from petitioner for the taxable years 2015 and 2016, under the provisions of I.R.C. section § 6662(a).