From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borup v. National Airlines

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 28, 1956
159 F. Supp. 807 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)

Opinion

February 28, 1956.

Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer Sills, Perth Amboy, N.J., Theodore E. Wolcott, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, New York City (Reilly Reilly, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


This case came on for pre-trial discussion before me on December 17, 1955. At that time, an offer of settlement for the sum of $15,000 was made and accepted by counsel. On January 18, 1956, Theodore E. Wolcott, Esq., attorney for the plaintiffs, telephoned and stated that his out-of-town counsel and client had refused to agree to the settlement. I advised Mr. Wolcott by letter dated January 19, 1956 that if he wished the case to be returned to the Trial Calendar, it would be necessary to file a formal application which should be supported by an affidavit of the out-of-town counsel and the client. I heard nothing further about the matter until the attached application was made dated February 21, 1956. In the interval, all other remaining cases growing out of the crash of the National Airlines plane on February 11, 1952 were pre-tried, a formal pre-trial order entered, and an order entered consolidating those cases for trial. Those cases now consolidated for trial are on the Trial Calendar of this Court.

The attached application shows that both the attorney for the plaintiffs and their New Jersey counsel recommended acceptance of the $15,000 settlement, but that the plaintiffs have refused to accept it. If plaintiffs are not willing to accept the settlement they, of course, have the right to have the case tried, but they have no right to unreasonably delay, as they have done in this case, and then expect to be joined in the consolidated action or to delay the causes of other plaintiffs whose counsel have participated in the pre-trial hearings and who have moved their case along to the point where it is now ready for trial.

The application to restore this cause to the Trial Calendar is granted. The cause shall be restored to the foot of the Trial Calendar for the October, 1956 term.


Summaries of

Borup v. National Airlines

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 28, 1956
159 F. Supp. 807 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)
Case details for

Borup v. National Airlines

Case Details

Full title:Delsie BORUP, Donald Borup, Arlene Krushenski Borup and Albert C. Borup v…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 28, 1956

Citations

159 F. Supp. 807 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)

Citing Cases

Borup v. National Airlines

In the interval, while waiting for Mr. Wilentz to take action on these matters, all the remaining cases…