From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borsuk v. Foothill/E. Transp. Corridor Agency (In re Toll Roads Litig.)

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:16-cv-00262 ODW (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

8:16-cv-00262 ODW (ADSx)

12-28-2021

In re TOLL ROADS LITIGATION v. FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY, et al, Defendants. PENNY DAVIDI BORSUK, et al, Plaintiffs,


Dated: January 4, 2022

(Referred to Special Master: Hon. Andrew J. Guilford (ret.))

Autumn D. Spaeth Magistrate Judge:

ORDER ADOPTING SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING STIPULATION REQUESTING APPROVAL OF PAYMENT TO OBJECTOR PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 23(e) (5)(B) [616]

HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

The Court having considered the stipulated request, pursuant to FRCP Rule 23(e)(5)(B), for a payment in the amount of $55,772.55 (lodestar: $53,821.25; costs: $1,951.30) to Objector David Coulter's counsel, Julian Brew, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement attached to the Stipulation, and having considered the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Andrew J. Guilford (ret.), the Stipulation and all relief requested therein is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borsuk v. Foothill/E. Transp. Corridor Agency (In re Toll Roads Litig.)

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 28, 2021
8:16-cv-00262 ODW (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Borsuk v. Foothill/E. Transp. Corridor Agency (In re Toll Roads Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re TOLL ROADS LITIGATION v. FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

8:16-cv-00262 ODW (ADSx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2021)