From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borst v. HoneyCocoon

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jan 20, 2022
No. 20-2441-JWB (D. Kan. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

20-2441-JWB

01-20-2022

NICK BORST, Plaintiff, v. HONEYCOCOON D/B/A HONEYCOCOON SHOES and JOHN DOE CORP. 1 and 2, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. BROOMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against HoneyCocoon Shoes (Doc. 7). Upon review of the docket, it is clear that Plaintiff has not obtained a clerk's entry of default as required under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 55. “Entry of default by the clerk is a necessary prerequisite that must be performed before a district court is permitted to issue a default judgment.” Watkins v. Donnelly, 551 Fed.Appx. 953, 958 (10th Cir. 2014).

Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is denied without prejudice to refiling after obtaining the clerk's entry of default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borst v. HoneyCocoon

United States District Court, District of Kansas
Jan 20, 2022
No. 20-2441-JWB (D. Kan. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Borst v. HoneyCocoon

Case Details

Full title:NICK BORST, Plaintiff, v. HONEYCOCOON D/B/A HONEYCOCOON SHOES and JOHN DOE…

Court:United States District Court, District of Kansas

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

No. 20-2441-JWB (D. Kan. Jan. 20, 2022)