From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borrego v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 23, 2015
871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Summary

affirming denial of postconviction relief where colloquy demonstrated understanding of charges and consequences

Summary of this case from Puccio v. State

Opinion

No. 14–1590.

09-23-2015

Teodoro BORREGO, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa, Respondent–Appellee.

Mark C. Smith, State Public Defender, and Rachel C. Regenold, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Bridget A. Chambers, Assistant Attorney General, Ralph R. Potter, County Attorney, and Brigit M. Barnes, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee State.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Borrego v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Sep 23, 2015
871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

affirming denial of postconviction relief where colloquy demonstrated understanding of charges and consequences

Summary of this case from Puccio v. State
Case details for

Borrego v. State

Case Details

Full title:Teodoro BORREGO, Applicant–Appellant, v. STATE of Iowa…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

871 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Puccio v. State

The plea colloquy reflects Puccio's ability to understand the nature of the charges, the nature of the…