Opinion
Argued May 21, 1941 —
Decided September 19, 1941.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 126 N.J.L. 112.
For the appellant, George W. Babcock.
For the respondents, David T. Wilentz, Attorney-General, and Milton, McNulty Augelli.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1.