From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boros v. Mayo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 31, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

January 31, 1957

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, ROBERT V. SANTANGELO, J.

Benjamin Adler for appellants-respondents.

Joseph R. D'Arrigo for respondent-appellant.


The imposition of the condition for the opening of the default which deprived defendants of a trial by jury was an abuse of discretion ( Glueck v. Tull, 192 App. Div. 81; Zeesell Realty v. Cunningham, 125 Misc. 444). The defendants in these circumstances did not absolutely waive the right to an examination before trial.

The order should be modified by striking therefrom the provision imposing conditions, and as modified affirmed, without costs. The cross appeal of the plaintiff should be dismissed.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Order modified, etc.


Summaries of

Boros v. Mayo

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 31, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Boros v. Mayo

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN BOROS, Respondent-Appellant, v. ALBERT I. MAYO et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1957

Citations

8 Misc. 2d 949 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
160 N.Y.S.2d 916