Opinion
No. 1: 11-cr-03082
02-16-2012
ORDER
PANNER, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court makes a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc.. 656 F. 2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Here, both parties object to the Report and Recommendation, so I have reviewed this matter de novo. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the deduction of $500.03 did not violate the parties' settlement agreement. Regarding defendants' objection, see no reason to address attorney's fees at this time. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#25) is adopted. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (#4) is denied and defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (#11) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
OWEN M. PANNER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE