From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bornhurst v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 13, 1966
25 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

January 13, 1966

Appeal from the Onondaga Supreme Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to either party, and complaint dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The defendant cannot be held liable unless at the time of the accident title to the Ford car involved was in Edmund A. Stearns Sons Auto Sales. This fact was not established. One Daniels entered into negotiations with the Stearns agency for a trade of the used Ford for a used Cadillac. There were certain negotiations looking toward such trade and exchange of titles, but the exchange was never consummated. Daniels refused to accept the Cadillac and thus Daniels never received title to the Cadillac, nor did Stearns obtain title to the Ford. Title to the Ford was to pass only upon complete consummation of the trade, an event which never occurred. All concur, except Bastow, J., who concurs as to reversal but votes for a new trial.


Summaries of

Bornhurst v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 13, 1966
25 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Bornhurst v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins Co.

Case Details

Full title:F. RICHARD BORNHURST, Respondent, v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)