From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bornhop v. Bornhop

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Sep 22, 1998
976 S.W.2d 622 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72997.

Opinion Filed: September 22, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HON. FRANK A. CONARD, JUDGE.

Michael A. Turken, St. Charles, for petitioner/appellant.

Michael P. Shea, St. Charles, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J.; KAROHL, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Senior Judge.


ORDER


Steven R. Bornhop (Father) appeals from the order of the trial court granting Michelle M. Bornhop's (Mother) motion for new trial or in the alternative motion for relief from judgment and order.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find no error of law. VonSande v. VonSande, 858 S.W.2d 233, 236 (Mo. App. S.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Bornhop v. Bornhop

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Sep 22, 1998
976 S.W.2d 622 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Bornhop v. Bornhop

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN R. BORNHOP, PETITIONER/APPELLANT, vs. MICHELLE M. BORNHOP…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Sep 22, 1998

Citations

976 S.W.2d 622 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)