From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bormuth v. City of Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11235 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-11235

06-11-2012

PETER BORMUTH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF JACKSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

On June 1, 2012, Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed two objections to discovery requests served upon him by Defendants. Plaintiff is fundamentally correct that, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d), discovery cannot be sought in this action until the parties confer as required by Rule 26(f). Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1). To facilitate this event, the court will set a scheduling conference in this matter. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants are DIRECTED to appear in the court's chambers at 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Room 707, Detroit, Michigan, for a scheduling conference on June 21, 2012, at 10 a.m. Attendees should be prepared to discuss a summary of their claims and defenses as well as the scope of discovery expected in this matter. Discovery in this case is SUSPENDED until the scheduling conference.

______________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, June 11, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522


Summaries of

Bormuth v. City of Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
Case No. 12-11235 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Bormuth v. City of Jackson

Case Details

Full title:PETER BORMUTH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF JACKSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-11235 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 11, 2012)