From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borland v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Essex County (Viscardi, J.).

Appeal from the County Court of Essex County (Main, Jr., J.).


Plaintiff commenced this action claiming that defendants wrongfully blocked a right-of-way over defendants' property. In our view, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction. Even if it is accepted that plaintiff set forth sufficient facts to show a likelihood of success on the merits, he failed to show that he would suffer irreparable injury if his request for the preliminary injunction was not granted. Plaintiff's remaining contentions have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit. As a final matter, we note that because the denial of a motion to reargue is not appealable, the appeal from the order denying such motion is dismissed.

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order entered March 29, 1993 is affirmed and appeal from order entered July 19, 1993 is dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Borland v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 31, 1994
202 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Borland v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE R. BORLAND, JR., Appellant, v. GORDON C. WILSON et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 891

Citing Cases

Kolodziej v. Martin

Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction…