From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borjas v. Brescher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 22, 1991
579 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1006.

May 22, 1991.

Calvin Fox of Tauler Fox, Miami, for petitioner.

Reid S. Baker of Wakefield Fulmer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.


This petition for writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial judge is granted.

Section 38.10, Florida Statutes, sets up the substantive right to seek disqualification of a trial judge. Brown v. St. George Island, Ltd., 561 So.2d 253, 255 (Fla. 1990). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.432 controls the disqualification procedure in civil cases. Id. Where a motion for disqualification fulfills the procedural requirements of that rule, is supported by a verified statement of specific facts that are reasonably sufficient to create a well-founded fear on the part of a party that he or she will not receive a fair trial, and is timely made, it should be granted. Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240, 242 (Fla. 1986), and cases cited therein.

Here the procedural requirements were met; counsel's affidavit supported the operative facts set forth in the motion, stating specifically how he came to know those facts; and, taken as true, those facts were reasonably sufficient to generate in petitioner a fear of bias on the part of the trial judge. The facts alleged in such a motion must be taken as true when the motion is supported by the required documentation. See, e.g., Gieseke v. Grossman, 418 So.2d 1055, 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

LETTS, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Borjas v. Brescher

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 22, 1991
579 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Borjas v. Brescher

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO BORJAS, PETITIONER, v. JUDGE GEORGE A. BRESCHER, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 22, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Williamson v. Williamson

PER CURIAM. The non-final order appealed is REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to grant in its entirety…

Strasser v. Yalamanchi

It is based on these comments that Appellants question the trial court's perceived impartiality, correctly…