From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 802 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1983

Decided June 2, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM T. BELLARD, J.

Douglas E. McKeon and John J. Tullman for appellants.

Frederick N. Gaffney and Henry M. Primavera for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While a disabling illness may excuse an attorney's delay in serving a complaint, in this case the default occurred well after the illness and therefore the default was not excused. Accordingly, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 802 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Borgia v. Interboro General Hospital

Case Details

Full title:CORRADO BORGIA, as Administrator of the Estate of ROSARIO BORGIA, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1983

Citations

59 N.Y.2d 802 (N.Y. 1983)
464 N.Y.S.2d 736
451 N.E.2d 483

Citing Cases

Willis v. Keeler Motor Car Co.

Although an attorney's illness may, under certain circumstances, constitute a reasonable excuse for a party's…

Schalberg v. Broadway Pops Int'l, Inc.

Sherman states that he recovered in August 2017; however, he does set forth a reasonable excuse for the seven…