From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borgia Patane, Inc., v. Paris

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 1, 1915
92 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1915)

Opinion

November, 1915.

Lind Pfeiffer (Alexander Pfeiffer, of counsel), for appellant.

Alfonso Bivona, for respondent.


One justice of the Municipal Court has no authority to vacate a judgment entered after a trial before another justice on the ground of irregularities in that trial. Moreover, there was no irregularity in conducting the trial without a stenographer where that was done upon stipulation of both sides. The stipulation was in the interest of economy, and evidently contemplated the waiver of an appeal Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley Co., 182 N.Y. 482. I know of no reason why a stipulation in an action in the Municipal Court is not just as binding as a stipulation in an action in any other court.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated; judgment to be set off against the costs of appeal.

BIJUR and PAGE, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.


Summaries of

Borgia Patane, Inc., v. Paris

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 1, 1915
92 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1915)
Case details for

Borgia Patane, Inc., v. Paris

Case Details

Full title:BORGIA PATANE, INC., Respondent, v . NATHAN PARIS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1915

Citations

92 Misc. 211 (N.Y. App. Term 1915)
155 N.Y.S. 347

Citing Cases

Myers v. Klein

The defendant, however, has no standing in court, except to move to open his default and we know of no…

Dancik v. Rappold

To uphold the petitioner's claim of a right to maintain these proceedings would in effect sanction a review…