From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borges v. Sallis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 2002
291 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

226

February 14, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered December 14, 2000, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs' application to serve and file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

MARK GOLD, for plaintiffs-appellants.

CHERYL PAYER, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rubin, Buckley, JJ.


Since plaintiff's motion was not made until more than one year and 90 days after the accrual of her cause of action, the motion court was without discretion to permit her to file a late notice of claim with respect to the alleged medical malpractice of defendant doctors, who, at the time of the purported malpractice, were employees of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (see, General Municipal Law §§ 50-e, 50-i; Pierson v. City of New York, 56 N.Y.2d 950; Lopez v. Lincoln Hosp., 272 A.D.2d 275). Contrary to plaintiffs' contention, the doctrine of equitable estoppel, which is to be invoked sparingly and only under exceptional circumstances (see, Ceely v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp., 162 A.D.2d 492; Matter of Gross v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp., 122 A.D.2d 793, 794), may not, under the circumstances presented, be utilized to preclude defendants' reliance on the notice of claim provisions. In this connection, we perceive no basis for plaintiff's contentions that certain conduct by Jacobi Hospital staff, i.e., delay in the production of medical records and misinforming plaintiffs as to whether defendant Sallis was on staff at Jacobi Hospital, was "calculated to mislead" plaintiff or otherwise prevent her from timely asserting her malpractice cause of action (see, Kuhlman v. Westfield Mem. Hosp., 212 A.D.2d 1007).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Borges v. Sallis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 14, 2002
291 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Borges v. Sallis

Case Details

Full title:CARMEN BORGES, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JULIAN GERALD SALLIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 14, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 271 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 284

Citing Cases

Wilson v. City of Buffalo

They simply failed to ascertain in a timely manner, despite employing an expert, that BSA caused or may have…

Samad-Matias v. City of New York

Here, unlike the attorney in Seif v. City of New York ( 218 AD2d 595, 596 [1st Dept 1995]), who the court…