From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 6, 2022
3:20-cv-01930-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-01930-JGC

01-06-2022

Amy L. Borger, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


ORDER

JAMES G. CARR SR. U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

This is an appeal from the denial of Social Security benefits. I referred the petition to a Magistrate Judge for filing of a Report & Recommendation, which the Magistrate Judge has filed (Doc. 19). In the Report & Recommendation the Magistrate Judge has duly notified the parties of the deadline for filing objections. That time has passed without the petitioner having filed timely objections. The Commissioner filed a response in which he indicated that he would not file an objection. (Doc. 20).

On de novo review, I find the Report & Recommendation well-taken in all respects.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED THAT the Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. 19) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of this court, and the petition be, and the same hereby is, REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter closed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Borger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 6, 2022
3:20-cv-01930-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Borger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Amy L. Borger, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-01930-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jan. 6, 2022)

Citing Cases

Aerial T. v. Comm'r Of Soc. Sec.

And in Borger v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court found an opined limitation for a “routine,…