From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boress v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 1, 2005
902 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D04-3157.

April 29, 2005. Rehearing Denied June 1, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Richard Tombrink, Judge.

Harry Boress, Spring Hill, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (A trial court's decision has the presumption of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error, and without a record of the trial proceedings, the reviewing court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory).

SAWAYA, C.J, THOMPSON and PLEUS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Boress v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 1, 2005
902 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Boress v. State

Case Details

Full title:Harry BORESS, a/k/a Mel Abele, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 1, 2005

Citations

902 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Walden v. State

Because the record does not sufficiently demonstrate the necessary facts that we would need to resolve the…

Walden v. State

Because the record does not sufficiently demonstrate the necessary facts that we would need to resolve the…