From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borenstein v. The Animal Found.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 10, 2023
2:19-CV-00985-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-CV-00985-CDS-NJK

10-10-2023

BRIAN BORENSTEIN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION, a domestic nonprofit corporation; COUNTY OF CLARK, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; SUNRISE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, a foreign limited-liability company domiciled in Delaware; CARLY SCHOLTEN, an individual; VICTOR ZAVALA, an individual; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-5; and DOE INDIVIDUALS 1-5, Defendants,

THEPALMERLA WFIRM, P.C. Raelene Palmer ESQ., Robert Melcic, ESQ., Richard E. Retamar, ESQ., Retamar & Millian, P.A. Attorney for Plaintiff, Brain Borenstein WILEY PETERSEN Jonathan, Blum EAQ., Attorney for Defendant, County of Clark, Victor Zavala


THEPALMERLA WFIRM, P.C. Raelene Palmer ESQ., Robert Melcic, ESQ., Richard E. Retamar, ESQ., Retamar & Millian, P.A. Attorney for Plaintiff, Brain Borenstein

WILEY PETERSEN Jonathan, Blum EAQ., Attorney for Defendant, County of Clark, Victor Zavala

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANTS' COUNTY OF CLARK AND VICTOR ZAVALA TO REPLY TO [ECF NO. 378] PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

[FIRST REQUEST]

Defendants, COUNTY OF CLARK (“Clark County”) and VICTOR ZAVALA (“Zavala”), by and through their counsel of record, Jonathan D. Blum, Esq., of the law firm Wiley Petersen and Plaintiff, BRIAN BORENSTEIN, by and through his counsel, Raelene K. Palmer, Esq. of The Palmer Law Firm, P.C., Robert S. Melcic, Esq. of The Law Office of Robert S. Melcic, and Richard E. Retamar, Esq. of Retamar & Millian, P.A., hereby stipulate and request the Court to extend the deadlines for Defendants Clark County and Zavala to reply to [ECF No. 378] Plaintiff's Opposition to [ECF No. 342], Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint by Defendants County of Clark and Victor Zavala (the “Opposition”) from Thursday, October 12, 2023 to Friday, October 20, 2023.

This is the first request for an extension. The parties submit that this request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of undue delay. The Opposition is lengthy and raises numerous issues of fact and law, making six days to properly respond difficult. Additionally, counsel for Defendants Clark County and Lt. Zavala have several depositions, deadlines, and other time-sensitive work obligations from October 9 through October 12, necessitating an additional eight days to properly reply.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Borenstein v. The Animal Found.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 10, 2023
2:19-CV-00985-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Borenstein v. The Animal Found.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN BORENSTEIN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION, a…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

2:19-CV-00985-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 10, 2023)