From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boren v. Saunders

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 30, 2011
3:09-cv-00731-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2011)

Opinion

3:09-cv-00731-HDM-RAM.

March 30, 2011


ORDER


Fed.R.Civ.P 4(m) permits the court to dismiss a defendant, on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, for the plaintiff's failure to serve a summons on the defendant within 120 days after filing the complaint. Plaintiff filed his second amended complaint naming several defendants, including Ringney, Hall, and Lyons, on September 7, 2010. The court screened and filed the complaint on October 5, 2010. Plaintiff has failed to serve defendants Ringney, Hall, or Lyons. On February 16, 2011, the court gave the plaintiff notice of its intent to dismiss for failure to timely serve those defendants. Plaintiff has not shown good cause to excuse the lack of service. Accordingly, defendants Rigney, Hall, and Lyons are dismissed from this action without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boren v. Saunders

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 30, 2011
3:09-cv-00731-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Boren v. Saunders

Case Details

Full title:REO BOREN, Plaintiff, v. SAUNDERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 30, 2011

Citations

3:09-cv-00731-HDM-RAM (D. Nev. Mar. 30, 2011)