From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bordges v. City of Flower Mound

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-310 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:11-CV-310

11-15-2011

RICK RAY BORDGES v. CITY OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS, OFFICER D. SMITH, OFFICER M DRAUT, AND TODD INGALSBE


(Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant)


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 14, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants Town of Flower Mound, Texas, Officer D. Smith and Officer M. Draut (Dkt. #13) should be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants Town of Flower Mound, Texas, Officer D. Smith and Officer M. Draut (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED. The case shall proceed against Defendant Todd Ingalsbe.

It is SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bordges v. City of Flower Mound

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-310 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Bordges v. City of Flower Mound

Case Details

Full title:RICK RAY BORDGES v. CITY OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS, OFFICER D. SMITH, OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 4:11-CV-310 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Leachman v. Stephens

In Franka, the supreme court explained that section 101.106(f) of the Texas Tort Claims Act was intended to…