From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borden v. United Specialty Ins. Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Feb 18, 2021
NO. 2020 CW 1286 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2021)

Opinion

NO. 2020 CW 1286

02-18-2021

LATASHIA BORDEN INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED HUSBAND, KENNETH ANCAR v. UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., W. B. COMPANY, INC. AND BRANDON BONVILLIAN CONSOLIDATED WITH KENNETH RAY ANCAR, JR., KEINA RAI TOMPKINS, AND KRYSTAL RENEE ANCAR v. QEO INSURANCE GROUP, BRANDON J. BONVILLAIN, W. B. COMPANY, INC., WILLIE BONVILAIN, JR. AND JOSEPHINE TRAHAN BONVILLAIN


In Re: QEO Group, LLC, applying for supervisory writs, 17th Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, No. 132303 c/w 132560. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., WELCH AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

WRC

Whipple, C.J., concurs. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam), are not met.

Welch, J., dissents. If an application to dismiss plaintiff's action is made after the defendant makes an appearance of record, the district court may refuse to grant the judgment of dismissal except with prejudice. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1671. This decision is in the vast discretion of the district court. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 1671 cmt. (b). An abuse of discretion has been found in dismissals without prejudice: (1) where substantive rights of the defendant would be lost; or (2) where the defendant would be deprived of a just defense. Kennison v. BLR Construction Companies, L.L.C., 2007-743 (La. App. 3d Cir. 12/5/07), 971 So.2d 1232, 1234. In opposition to QEO Group, LLC's motion to dismiss, Louisiana Companies argued that a dismissal without prejudice would allow QEO Group, LLC to file another case in another forum, which would create legal issues as to whether depositions and/or filings in this case could be used in the new forum. Louisiana Companies also argued it "may be faced with having to engage in depositions/filings that could in large part duplicate what already has been accomplished in this litigation." However, ordinary inconveniences of double litigation do not equate to a loss of a substantive right or a deprivation of a just defense, and the fact that the plaintiff intends to institute, or in fact institutes, another suit on the same cause of action is not a sufficient ground for a denial of the plaintiff's motion to discontinue an action. Sizemore v. Reilly-Benton Company, Inc., 2018-0826 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2/6/19), 265 So.3d 41, 45, citing 27 C.J.S. Dismissal and Nonsuit § 27. Louisiana Companies did not point to any substantive right or defense that would be lost as the result of dismissing QEO Group, LLC's claims against it; therefore, I find the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion to dismiss and would grant the writ application, dismissing all claims asserted by QEO Group, LLC against Louisiana Companies without prejudice. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Borden v. United Specialty Ins. Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Feb 18, 2021
NO. 2020 CW 1286 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Borden v. United Specialty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LATASHIA BORDEN INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF HER DECEASED HUSBAND…

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 18, 2021

Citations

NO. 2020 CW 1286 (La. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2021)