From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Borden v. Meiji Milk Products Co.

U.S.
Jun 3, 1991
500 U.S. 953 (1991)

Summary

holding that an issue over whether a "prehire" collective-bargaining agreement had been repudiated was a labor dispute within the meaning of the Norris-LaGuardia Act and that injunctive relief staying arbitration thereunder was, therefore, unavailable

Summary of this case from Burlington Northern v. Teamsters Local 174

Opinion

No. 90-1561.

June 3, 1991.


ORDERS

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 919 F. 2d 822.


Summaries of

Borden v. Meiji Milk Products Co.

U.S.
Jun 3, 1991
500 U.S. 953 (1991)

holding that an issue over whether a "prehire" collective-bargaining agreement had been repudiated was a labor dispute within the meaning of the Norris-LaGuardia Act and that injunctive relief staying arbitration thereunder was, therefore, unavailable

Summary of this case from Burlington Northern v. Teamsters Local 174

upholding statute despite equal protection challenge

Summary of this case from Terry v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. (In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)
Case details for

Borden v. Meiji Milk Products Co.

Case Details

Full title:BORDEN, Inc. v. MEIJI MILK PRODUCTS Co., Ltd

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 3, 1991

Citations

500 U.S. 953 (1991)

Citing Cases

Terry v. McNeil-PPC, Inc. (In re Tylenol (Acetaminophen) Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)

“In Alabama, only punitive damages are available in wrongful death actions, and these damages may be awarded…

Alvenus Ship'g v. Delta Petroleum (U.S.A.)

32. In Borden Inc. v. Meiji Milk Products Co., Ltd., 919 F.2d 822, 825-27 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 500…