From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bordelon v. Mindoro

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2019
No. 19-15895 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-15895

11-26-2019

JEROME BORDELON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL MINDORO, M.D.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05724-CRB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

California state prisoner Jerome Bordelon appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Mindoro because Bordelon failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Mindoro was deliberately indifferent to Bordelon's heart issues. See id. at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bordelon v. Mindoro

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 26, 2019
No. 19-15895 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Bordelon v. Mindoro

Case Details

Full title:JEROME BORDELON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL MINDORO, M.D.; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 26, 2019

Citations

No. 19-15895 (9th Cir. Nov. 26, 2019)