From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boothe v. Pyles

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 18, 1968
215 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37709.

October 23, 1968. Rehearing Denied November 18, 1968.

Writ of certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

John J. O'Riorden, of Dart, Bell Dickinson, Sarasota, for petitioners.

Edward H. Hurt, Orlando, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 10, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied. Attorney's fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent-claimant's attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting Chief Justice, and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Boothe v. Pyles

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 18, 1968
215 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Boothe v. Pyles

Case Details

Full title:HARRY J. BOOTHE ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. HOUSTON PYLES ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 18, 1968

Citations

215 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1968)