From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1931
233 App. Div. 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

September 30, 1931.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Erie County.

Henry L. Franklin, for the appellant.

Robert J. Lansdowne, for the respondent.

Present — SEARS, P.J., TAYLOR, EDGCOMB, THOMPSON and CROSBY, JJ.


The parties were all residents of New York city when the transactions involved in this case occurred. The transactions occurred in New York city. The plaintiff now lives in Erie county and she and her husband are the only material witnesses living in Erie county. The defendant and his wife and an employee of the defendant who live in New York county are apparently material witnesses. This action is entitled to a preference in New York county. Under these circumstances the place of trial should be transferred from Erie to New York county.

All concur.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event, upon condition that the appellant shall comply with the terms of the stipulation given September 2, 1931.


Summaries of

Booth v. Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1931
233 App. Div. 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Booth v. Weinstein

Case Details

Full title:IDA M. BOOTH, Respondent, v. ISAAC WEINSTEIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
252 N.Y.S. 775