From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Dec 3, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV746 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV746

12-03-2020

TERRENCE MACK BOOTH, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a letter asking for legal advice pertaining to the writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 1.) By Memorandum Order entered on October 26, 2020, the Court explained that it cannot provide legal advice to litigants. Nevertheless, the Court provided Petitioner an opportunity to pursue a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and the Clerk mailed him the standardized form. The Court directed Petitioner to complete and return the standardized form for filing a § 2254 petition within twenty (20) days of the entry of the October 26, 2020 Memorandum Order. The Court warned Petitioner that the failure to comply with the terms of the October 26, 2020 Memorandum Order would result in the dismissal of the action. More than twenty (20) days have elapsed and Petitioner has not completed and returned the § 2254 form. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall issue.

/s/_________

M. Hannah Lauck

United States District Judge Date: 12/03/20
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Booth v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Dec 3, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV746 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Booth v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE MACK BOOTH, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Dec 3, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV746 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2020)