From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Thrailkill

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 1, 1976
225 S.E.2d 349 (S.C. 1976)

Opinion

20226

June 1, 1976.

E. Delance Poston, Esq., of Johnsonville, for Appellant. J.M. Long, Jr., Esq., of Conway, for Respondent.


June 1, 1976.


This action, brought by a building contractor to recover for the construction of a room at the home of the defendant-appellant, was tried before a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff-contractor.

The defendant has appealed, alleging error on the part of the trial judge in the admission of certain evidence and in failure of the trial judge to grant a motion for a nonsuit, directed verdict, or judgment non obstante veredicto.

After a review of the record and the briefs, and hearing argument of counsel, the Court is of the unanimous view that a full written opinion would serve no precedential value and that (1) no error of law appears, and (2) that the evidence is not insufficient to support the jury verdict.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the verdict of the lower court is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Booth v. Thrailkill

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 1, 1976
225 S.E.2d 349 (S.C. 1976)
Case details for

Booth v. Thrailkill

Case Details

Full title:Franklin BOOTH, Respondent, v. Dr. Ben THRAILKILL, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1976

Citations

225 S.E.2d 349 (S.C. 1976)
225 S.E.2d 349