From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Brea Police Dep't

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 19, 2021
SA CV 21-01196-FMO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2021)

Opinion

SA CV 21-01196-FMO (DFM)

10-19-2021

Crystal S. Booth v. Brea Police Department et al.


Present: The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

On July 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint against the Brea Police Department, Sergeant C. Winger, Roberto Mejia, and John Doe. See Dkt. 1. After more than three months, there is no record that Plaintiff has properly served any defendant. "If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on its own motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). The Court "must extend" the time for service if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure. Id.

Plaintiff is thus ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than November 1, 2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the proof of service of summons and complaint as to all defendants as an appropriate response to this order. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Booth v. Brea Police Dep't

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 19, 2021
SA CV 21-01196-FMO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Booth v. Brea Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Crystal S. Booth v. Brea Police Department et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 19, 2021

Citations

SA CV 21-01196-FMO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2021)