From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booth v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
1:11cv0727 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

1:11cv0727 DLB

09-21-2011

KIMBERLY K. BOOTH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF

TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO

REMAND

Plaintiff filed this action for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security on May 5, 2011.

On September 16, 2011, the Commissioner filed a Motion to Remand the action pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Commissioner states that remand for a de novo hearing is necessary because significant portions of the December 4, 2009, hearing are inaudible and Exhibit 2F is missing pages.

Plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to this motion within fifteen (15) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff may file a statement of non-opposition if there is no objection to the remand.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Booth v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
1:11cv0727 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Booth v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY K. BOOTH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

1:11cv0727 DLB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)