From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boose v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 23, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:07cv366/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:07cv366/RV/MD.

April 23, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated March 24, 2008. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's supplemental motion to dismiss (doc. 29) is GRANTED.

3. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Boose v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Apr 23, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:07cv366/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Boose v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:MALRIK CORDALE BOOSE, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Apr 23, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:07cv366/RV/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 23, 2008)