From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boone v. Kingsbury

Supreme Court of California
Dec 31, 1928
206 Cal. 791 (Cal. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 12707.

December 31, 1928.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel Surveyor-General of the State of California to issue permit to prospect for oil and gas upon tide and submerged lands. Writ granted.

Faries Williamson, David R. Faries, Frederick Williamson, Edwin Heizman and McIntyre Faries for Petitioner.

A.L. Weil, Morrison, Hohfeld, Foerster, Shuman Clark, Roy Maggart, Geo. B. Bush, Thomas A. Joyner and Philip C. Farman, Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, for Respondent.

Flint Mackay, Frank P. Flint, Arthur R. Smiley, Alexander T. Sokolow and E.W. Miller, Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASES.


THE COURT.

[1] The questions presented by the petition herein were fully considered in our discussion of cases S.F. No. 12707 to No. 12766, both inclusive, ante, p. 148 [ 273 P. 797], all of which were considered together in one opinion, this day filed. Upon the authority of what we said in our consideration of said cases considered in one opinion, and more particularly with respect to what we said in that portion of said opinion bearing directly upon the instant case, the petition of K.E. Boone for a writ of mandamus commanding the surveyor-general of the state to issue to petitioner Boone a permit to prospect for oil and gas upon the tide and submerged lands described in his petition is granted and the writ will issue. It is so ordered.

Rehearing denied.

Shenk, J., and Curtis, J., voted for a rehearing.


Summaries of

Boone v. Kingsbury

Supreme Court of California
Dec 31, 1928
206 Cal. 791 (Cal. 1928)
Case details for

Boone v. Kingsbury

Case Details

Full title:K.E. BOONE, Petitioner, v. W.S. KINGSBURY, Surveyor-General, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Dec 31, 1928

Citations

206 Cal. 791 (Cal. 1928)
274 P. 61