From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boomer v. Williamson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-850 (M.D. Pa. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-850

05-30-2012

RODNEY BOOMER, Plaintiff, v. TROY WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants


(JUDGE CONABOY)


ORDER

As a result of the telephone conference held this date, the following matters have been agreed upon:

1. This case proceeds to trial on three claims--
a. the claim of excessive force brought against Defendants Francis and Schappert;
b. the claim arising from the use of a restraining chair brought against Defendant Campos; and
C. the retaliation claim brought against Defendant Schappert;
2. This case remains of the November 2012 Trial List;
3. A pretrial conference will be scheduled by separate order at the discretion of the Court.

_________________________

RICHARD P. CONABOY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Boomer v. Williamson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 30, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-850 (M.D. Pa. May. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Boomer v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY BOOMER, Plaintiff, v. TROY WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 30, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-850 (M.D. Pa. May. 30, 2012)