Opinion
03-CV-6348L.
January 12, 2010
DECISION AND ORDER
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #58) is denied. In deciding that motion, the Court must viewing the factual record in this case in the light most favorable to the non-moving parties, i.e., the defendants, and draw all reasonable inferences in their favor. Leibowitz v. Cornell University, 584 F.3d 487, 498 (2d Cir. 2009). Applying that standard here, it would clearly be impossible to grant summary judgment for plaintiff without resolving disputed issues of fact, which the Court may not do on a motion for summary judgment. See Goldberg Connolly v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc., 565 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir. 2009).
CONCLUSION
Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #58) is denied.IT IS SO ORDERED.