Opinion
No. A12A1539.
08-14-2012
BOOKER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES.
Serbrena Booker, pro se. Randy Joan Comins, Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Mark James Cicero, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for Appellee.
Serbrena Booker, pro se.
Randy Joan Comins, Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Mark James Cicero, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for Appellee.
McFADDEN, Judge. Pursuant to a request filed by the Georgia Department of Human Resources, the trial court held that Serbrena Booker's son was emancipated because he had reached the age of majority and was not enrolled in and attending a secondary school; thus, the court held, under OCGA § 19–6–15(e) the son's father no longer was obligated to pay child support. Because Booker has failed to comply with the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5–6–35, but instead has filed a direct appeal from this ruling, we must dismiss the appeal.
" OCGA § 5–6–35(a)(2) provides, without exception, that appeals in ‘domestic relations cases' must be brought by application for discretionary appeal." Walker v. Estate of Mays, 279 Ga. 652, 653(1), 619 S.E.2d 679 (2005). This is a domestic relations case subject to review only by application because its underlying subject matter is a father's obligation to provide child support for his son. See Camp v. Camp, 247 Ga. 533, 277 S.E.2d 55 (1981) ; Davis v. Welch, 205 Ga.App. 462, 463, 422 S.E.2d 323 (1992). This case falls within OCGA § 5–6–35(a)(2) even though it was initiated by the Department of Human Resources. See Fitzgerald v. Dept. of Human Resources, 231 Ga.App. 129, 497 S.E.2d 659 (1998) (appeal from order modifying child support obligation in case initiated by Department of Human Resources must be brought as discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5–6–35(a)(2), among other subsections).
"Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional. Therefore, [Booker's] failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5–6–35 deprives this Court of jurisdiction, and [her] appeal must be dismissed." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Fitzgerald, 231 Ga.App. at 129–130, 497 S.E.2d 659.
Appeal dismissed.
BARNES, P.J., and ADAMS, J., concur.