From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Booker v. Capital One Auto Fin. Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 3, 2023
CIVIL 4:22-CV-609-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2023)

Opinion

CIVIL 4:22-CV-609-SDJ

03-03-2023

HARVEY WATKINS BOOKER, III v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE CORPORATION, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SEAN D. JORDAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), this matter having been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 1, 2023, the Report of the Magistrate Judge, (Dkt. #13), was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that pro se Plaintiff Harvey Watkins Booker, III's “Affidavit of Amount Owed by the Defendant and Request for Default Judgment by Clerk with Sum Certain per Red. [sic] R. Civ. Proc. 55(b)(1),” (Dkt. #5), be denied. Having assessed the Report, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report should be adopted.

It is therefore ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Harvey Watkins Booker, III's “Affidavit of Amount Owed by the Defendant and Request for Default Judgment by Clerk with Sum Certain per Red. [sic] R. Civ. Proc. 55(b)(1),” (Dkt. #5), is DENIED.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

Booker v. Capital One Auto Fin. Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 3, 2023
CIVIL 4:22-CV-609-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Booker v. Capital One Auto Fin. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HARVEY WATKINS BOOKER, III v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE CORPORATION, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Mar 3, 2023

Citations

CIVIL 4:22-CV-609-SDJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2023)

Citing Cases

Euristhe v. Beckmann

Accordingly, the Court cannot proceed to step two-consideration of [the p]laintiffs Motion.”); see also…

Donald v. Bank of Am.

(The “[p]laintiff has neither requested that the clerk enter the default, nor has the clerk entered the…