From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bookard v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 10, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-5740 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-5740.

July 10, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2007, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 1), the Respondent's Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rapoport is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Bookard v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 10, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-5740 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Bookard v. Tennis

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BOOKARD v. FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 10, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-5740 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 10, 2007)

Citing Cases

Carrion v. Corbett

Carrion argues that requiring the petitioner to show the underlying claim has merit is inconsistent with…