From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 19, 2014
152 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D14–1344.

2014-11-19

Noe BOO, a.k.a. Noel Diaz, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Dava J. Tunis, Judge. Noe Boo a.k.a. Noel Diaz, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jacob Addicott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Dava J. Tunis, Judge.
Noe Boo a.k.a. Noel Diaz, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jacob Addicott, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SHEPHERD, C.J., and LAGOA, and SCALES, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR


PER CURIAM.

Noe Boo, a.k.a. Noel Diaz (“Boo”), appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his Motion for Correction of Jail Sentence/Credit pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The trial court subsequently denied Appellant's motion for rehearing as well as his request for an evidentiary hearing. On June 5, 2014, Appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging both the trial court's final order and its denial of his motion for rehearing. Based on the State's confession of error, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In his 3.801 motion, Appellant alleged that he should have been credited with 566 days served, not 367 days, as calculated by the Department of Corrections (“DOC”), and later adopted through the trial court's order. As the State concedes, the trial court failed to attach any documents to its order that conclusively refuted Appellant's allegations. In fact, the attached DOC calculations tend to support Appellant's allegations in that they contain patently erroneous mathematical conclusions.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801(e), which incorporates Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f), the trial court was required to attach records that conclusively refuted Appellant's motion seeking additional jail credit. SeeFla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) (“If the denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the final order.”). See alsoFla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

As such, we reverse and remand for the trial court to: (i) attach documents refuting Appellant's claim; (ii) award Appellant proper credit for time served; or (iii) set the matter for an evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Boo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 19, 2014
152 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Boo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Noe BOO, a.k.a. Noel Diaz, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 19, 2014

Citations

152 So. 3d 81 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. State

On the State's proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court's July 29, 2014 order and remand with…