Bontilao v. Horel

Full title: ARPUBERTITO BONTILAO, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 9, 2007

No. CIV S-06-2644 FCD CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2644 FCD CMK P.

February 9, 2007

ORDER

FRANK DAMRELL JR., District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 8, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed [date], are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).