From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bontemps v. Saukhla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P

03-30-2020

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed February 12, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 5. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections //// //// to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: March 30, 2020

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13:bont2605.no.fee.f&r


Summaries of

Bontemps v. Saukhla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2020
No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Bontemps v. Saukhla

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, Plaintiff, v. NARINDER SAUKHLA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 30, 2020

Citations

No. 2:19-cv-2605 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020)